International Drug Policy Reform Conference Kicks Off in LA

By Ellen Komp, Cannabis Culture - Friday, November 4 2011

An estimated 2200 people, a record number, are attending this year's Drug Policy Alliance conference at the Westin Bonaventure in Los Angeles.

The event opened this morning at a rousing session lead by DPA Executive Director Ethan Nadelmann, who introduced California's Lieutenant Governor Gavin Newsom to an appreciative crowd.

Newsom welcomed the group to the "wacky, wonderful" state of 37 million "dreamers, doers and entrepreneurs." He recognized that California lead the way to reform in 1996 with the passage of Prop. 215, legalizing medical marijuana, and with the 2000 passage of Prop. 36, to offer drug treatment instead of incarceration to low-level offenders. Newsom said Prop. 36 has saved California $2.5 billion.

In 1980, Newsom pointed out, the U.S. incarcerated half a million prisoners; that number has swollen to 2.3 million today as the US cages 25% of the world's prisoners. In California, the prison budget has soared from 3% of the budget in 1980 to 11.2% today, even as the CSU and UC college systems, once the "tent pole" of the state's economy, receive only 6.6% of the budget. He noted that 2/3 of those imprisoned are probation or parole violators, and wondered aloud how many of those violations were for drugs.

"At what point is this not code red?" Newsom asked. "What the hell are we doing?"
Newsom, who took a huge hit from the right when he came out for same-sex marriage after taking office as mayor of San Francisco, joked that his progressive staff wondered what the hell he was doing at the DPA conference, adding that drug policy made gay marriage seem easy.

"We're risk-averse in politics," Newsom said, allowing that he fell prey to that syndrome. "We have courage after we leave office."
Newsom said he felt like he was reliving earlier federal medical marijuana raids as he mentioned the latest US actions in Fresno, Sacramento, and elsewhere in California. He called for the state to step up against federal encroachment, saying we need to move beyond the "framework of fear" with "leadership, stewardship, constancy and faith."

"If you could take record private conversations [on this issue], it would break your heart," he said. "We know better, we're just not doing better." He spoke more, but his words were drowned out by thunderous applause.

Pete White from the LA Community Action Network spoke next, opening his speech by quoting Frederick Douglas: "I spent 20 years praying for freedom, but it wasn't until I I started praying with my legs that freedom came." White added, "As we occupy our country, we are using our legs." He called the WOD "a full-scale moratorium on our civil rights." He noted that in nearby Skid Row, the "most intense and sustained war on poverty and addiction" is taking place with "tools more sinister than usual." Drug convictions in LA lead to bans on housing and other benefits, sometimes for life, because of the actions of the LA city attorney's office. Quoting Douglas again when he said slaves were expected to sing, he ended with Malcom X's quote, "Stop singing and start swinging."

Alice Huffman, chair of the California chapter of the NAACP, came out next to announce, "NAACP is in the house." Huffman, who just joined the board of directors of LEAP (Law Enforcement Against Prohibition), said, "I am sick and tired of my people being the pawns in a stupid war." She called for the group to "elevate your movement to embrace us and fight injustice."

Former New Mexico governor and Republican presidential candidate Gary Johnson next took the stage, and brought up the recent Gallup poll that showed 50% of Americans are for marijuana legalization. "Yet, 0% of politicians are for legalization," he noted. "Is there any other area where there is this disconnect?" Johnson predicted a 75% drop in border violence in Mexico with legalization, yet the government's solution is to add even more guns at the border.

You don't see Johnson in the Republican debates because candidates are invited to those based on their poll results. However, the polls that CNN and other networks use haven't included Johnson's name. Instead buffoons like Herman Cain, Michelle Bachman and Rick Perry, and relics like Rick Santorum have their silly say, and progressives must hold their noses at Ron Paul's anti-abortion stance to find a Republican candidate who supports marijuana legalization.

Nadelmann wrapped up the opening panel by sounding a theme of inclusiveness. "We are old, young and in between; black, white and in between; gay, straight and in between; drug users and non users, and in between."
"We are people who want the right to get high or have been enlightened by psychedelics; people who have seen the worst that drugs can do, and see that that prohibition only makes things worse; and also people who don't really care, they just want our fundamental freedoms back. We love, hate, or don't give a damn about drugs, but we all believe the War on Drugs is wrong."

He singled out prosecutors as the worst drug warriors of all, saying, "DAs and prosecutors are out of control in American society and have to be called out." He noted that mandatory minimum sentences take control away from judges and give it to prosecutors, who do what they will regardless of "public opinion, health, safety or decency."

Saying he dreams of someday seeing a drug war truth & reconciliation commission like South Africa had after apartheid, Nadelmann used the automobile as an example of a substance that society has learned to live with and make safer due to intelligent, harm reduction policies.

The conference continues through Saturday, with panels, breakout sessions, community meetings and field trips. An "End the Drug War" rally in MacArthur Park is taking place tonight. See more at http://www.reformconference.org/

Ellen Komp is Deputy Director of California NORML and a regular contributor to Cannabis Culture. She manages the website VeryImportantPotheads.com and blogs at Tokin Woman.

CA Voters Favor Early Release of Low-Level, Non-Violent Inmates

LOS ANGELES — July 20, 2011 — Faced with a court mandate to reduce overcrowding in California prisons, a majority of the state’s voters favor shorter sentences for some offenders rather than raising taxes or cutting services such as education or health care to pay for new prison construction or prisoner relocation, according to a new USC Dana and David Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences/Los Angeles Times Poll.


In May, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that California must release more than 33,000 inmates to ease prison overcrowding. By a 50-point margin, California voters oppose increasing taxes to pay for new prison construction or to send inmates to other states. About 73 percent of voters oppose increasing taxes to build new prisons or relocate prisoners — including a majority of self-identified Democratic, Independent and Republican voters — compared to 23 percent of voters in favor.

“In these tough economic times, voters expect their politicians to make spending priorities just like their families do, and right now, spending more money on prisons is not a high priority for Californians. When it comes to prisons, voters are looking for solutions that don’t raise taxes or take money from other priorities like education,” said Linda DiVall, president of American Viewpoint, a Republican polling firm that conducted the USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times Poll with Democratic polling firm Greenberg Quinlan Rosner

Prisons: Dan Schnur, director of the Jesse M. Unruh Institute of Politics, and Evan Halper, Sacramento Bureau Chief from the Los Angeles Times, discuss how the public feels about what to do about the current prison system. For more video analysis from USC and the Los Angeles Times, visit the USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times Poll Web site http://dornsife.usc.edu/poll

When presented with a series of measures to ease overcrowding in California prisons, a majority of the state’s voters said they favor reducing life sentences for third-strike offenders convicted of property crimes, such as burglary, auto theft or shoplifting.

Sixty-two percent favor reducing life sentences for property crime offenders convicted under California’s “three strikes” law, and 31 percent favor it “strongly.” Overall, 34 percent of voters opposed reducing life sentences for third-strike offenders.

“Californians prefer reducing sentences for certain non-violent offenders as the best alternative to spending cuts and tax increases,” said Stan Greenberg, CEO of Greenberg Quinlan Rosner. “That a smaller percentage ‘strongly’ favor early release suggests these are tough choices made in the context of the state economy and the court mandate to reduce California prison populations within the next two years.”

By a double-digit margin, White voters were more likely than Latino voters to support reducing life sentences for property crime offenders. Sixty-four percent of White voters support reducing sentences for property crime offenders convicted under the “three-strikes” law, and 33 percent opposed. Latino voters were more evenly split: 50 percent supported reducing life sentences and 45 percent opposed.

Latino voters were also less likely than White voters to support releasing low-level nonviolent offenders from prison early, though a majority of both groups and voters overall said they were in favor of the measure to help reduce the prison population.

Overall, 69 percent of California voters support early release of non-violent offenders, with 33 percent favoring it “strongly.” This includes 71 percent of White voters, 78 percent of Black voters, 69 percent of Asian American voters, and 59 percent of Latino voters. Twenty-eight percent of voters oppose early release of low-level non-violent offenders.

Californians across party lines oppose cutting government services to help pay for measures that would ease prison overcrowding. Overall, 84 percent of voters oppose cutting government services to pay for prisons, including 87 percent of self-identified Democrats, 82 percent of Republicans and 83 percent of Independent voters.

A video of poll experts discussing these results is available on the USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times Poll Web site, http://dornsife.usc.edu/poll

How ChildhoodTrauma Create Addicts—And Why "Tough Love" Rarely Works

Childhood abuse and chronic stress massively increase the risk of people turning to drugs and alcohol. A little advice to fans of "tough love" treatment like Dr. Drew: Try a little tenderness.


By Maia Szalavitz     09/25/11

Is addiction caused by drugs alone? Or do chronic stress and trauma in childhood play the determining factor in predicting who will lose control once they start using drugs?

As our society still tries to deal with the consequences of 9/11 a full ten years after the attacks, the continuing role of childhood trauma in addiction gains increasing scientific traction. Early life experience programs the brain and body for the environment it encounters: a calm, nurturing upbringing will orient a child to thrive in most conditions, while a stressful, barren one will predispose it to conditions of scarcity, anxiety and chaos. Not all stress is bad, however. Learning requires some stress, and coping with intermittent, mild doses builds the system up, like a muscle. Stress crosses into the hazard zone of trauma only when it comes in "doses" that are too large or too unpredictable or too sustained over which the person has little or no control. Paradoxically, early neglect—an absence of parenting—can be as traumatic as overt abuse.

One study of children who attended the 10 middle and high schools closest to ground zero where the Twin Towers stood found that the greater the number of trauma-inducing factors they experienced, the more likely the kids were to increase their use of alcohol and other drugs. These factors included knowing someone who died, being personally in fear for your life or that of your loved ones during the attacks and how close their school was to the towers. Compared to those with no exposure factors, teens with one were five times more likely to increase alcohol and other drug use and those with three or more factors were a stunning 19 times more likely to increase their alcohol or drug use. The youth who increased their use had more difficulty with their schoolwork, lower grades and more behavior problems, suggesting that they weren’t just using drugs but had developed drug abuse or even potential dependence.

This research confirms a whole body of literature showing that the more stressful your childhood experiences—and the more different your types of stress—the greater your odds of later life addiction. The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) study, which includes some 17,000 participants in California’s Kaiser Permanente insurance program, found multiple, dose-dependent relationships between severe childhood stress and all types of addictions, including overeating. Adverse childhood experiences measured included emotional, physical and sexual abuse, neglect, having a mentally ill or addicted parent, losing a parent to death or divorce, living in a house with domestic violence and having an incarcerated parent.

Compared to a child with no ACEs, one with six or more is nearly three times more likely to be a smoker as an adult. A child with four or more is five times more likely to become an alcoholic and 60% more likely to become obese. And a boy with four or more ACEs is a whopping 46 times more likely to become an IV drug user later in life than one who has had no severe adverse childhood experiences.

“These are extraordinarily strong relationships,” says Dr. Vincent Felitti, a founder of the ACE study and the former chief of preventive medicine at Kaiser Permanente in San Diego. “You read the newspaper and the cancer scare of the week is about something that raises risk by 30%. Here, we’re talking thousands of percentage points.”

The type of adverse experience doesn’t make a large difference in the results, according to Felitti: what seems to matter most is the cumulative effect of multiple types of stress. For example, having been both physically abused and neglected is worse than having been physically abused alone.

One factor does stand out, however. “I would have assumed before we looked at it that probably the most destructive problem would be incest—but interestingly it was not, it was co-equal with the others,” says Felitti. Instead, he notes, “The one with the slight edge, by 15% over the others, was chronic recurrent humiliation, what we termed as emotional abuse,” citing examples like parents calling their children stupid and worthless. (The study did not look at bullying by peers, but other studies have found that such abuse can haver similarly negative health effects.)

Ironically, humiliation is a common theme in addiction treatment, where tough confrontation to “break” addicts remains a frequent practice, despite research showing its ineffectiveness and harmfulness. Some so-called therapeutic-community programs, for example, place people on a “hot seat,” where they are confronted about their personality flaws and other negative qualities, sometimes for hours on end. Other programs force people to wear humiliating signs or even diapers. Sexual humiliation, such as forcing men or teenage boys to wear drag or women pose as prostitutes, is not uncommon. Although mainstream programs like Phoenix House and Daytop have worked to eliminate such degrading practices, they persist in the industry, particularly—and tragically—with adolescents.

Indeed, people traumatized as children can actually be re-traumatized by this form of treatment, exacerbating both post-traumatic stress disorder and addiction.

Felitti insists that the best way to treat addiction is with empathy and compassion. “I would argue that the person using [drugs] is not using them to have a problem, they’re using drugs to find a solution,” he says. Although some addicts have no apparent childhood trauma, at least half have suffered at least one form of severe childhood stress and many have experiences multiple exposures. Among people with the most severe addictions, trauma histories are ubiquitous. And emotional sensitivity, which varies widely with genetics, may make experiences that would not be traumatic for most children intensely traumatic for some. Though all addiction is certainly not caused by trauma, it is becoming increasingly clear that it can be a big part of the disorder.

Fortunately, the same key factor that provokes resilience in children coping with chronic stress also spurs recovery in from addiction. That’s social support: whether it comes from a 12-step program like AA, from family members, a loving spouse, friends, other support groups or civic and religious organizations. Safe, familiar people buffer us against stress: the physiology of our stress systems is designed to calm down with a nurturing word or touch from someone we trust. If we want to prevent addiction and promote recovery, we need to love more and stress less.

Maia Szalavitz is a columnist at The Fix. She also is a health reporter at Time magazine online, and co-author, with Bruce Perry, of Born for Love: Why Empathy Is Essential—and Endangered (Morrow, 2010), and author of Help at Any Cost: How the Troubled-Teen Industry Cons Parents and Hurts Kids (Riverhead, 2006).

Memoirs of a Rock Star Wife

A recovering addict and former 60’s rock star wife reminisces about all the lives lost to drugs—and all those that can be saved today.

The author with Berry Oakley, Chuck Negron, and John Densmore

By Julia Negron

09/01/11

• A Day For Those Who Died by OD

Last week, as I was typing up a list of all the overdose victims I'd known over the years, I couldn't help but think back to the time 40 years ago when I got up close and personal with overdose myself. It was back in the late 1960's: the burgeoning Sunset Strip music scene, 1967's "Summer of Love" and the Monterey Pop Festival were my Rock and Roll training grounds. By ’67, I was working as an employee in the A&R department of Liberty Records—my personal stairway to heaven. I still maintained a regular presence on the Sunset Strip club scene, but by 1968, I moved in with and soon married to rock icon John Densmore of The Doors.   

It was the beginning of a most fabulous lifestyle. I often look back and wonder what the world would be like if we knew then what we know now. We did not know what dangerous games we were playing.  

All fun and games (and an occasional nod and wink), I remember an intimate birthday dinner party for Jim Morrison before he went off to Paris. We all laughed when another Doors wife Lynn Krieger and I rolled up the birthday present we had found for Jim—a Courvoisier cognac bottle decanter on wheels made to look like an antique war cannon. Today I might choose something different.

Even then there was whispering about some of our very favorite musician friends being “real” junkies: Tim Hardin, James Taylor? But no, it was hard to believe. I had been swimming in the Los Angeles drug scene for a while and had never even seen heroin. Then came the news: both Jimi Hendrix and Janis Joplin dead? Wow, they must have been living in a rock world somewhat different from mine.   

The real shock started with my own mother, who was 47 when she died of an overdose; my baby sister Connie would follow her 12 years later. Still, I saw my mother’s death as a fluke or even expected. After all, she had a long history of drug and alcohol problems.  

But then Jim. Jim! Jim Morrison! Newspaper headlines screamed. Even our own little band circle didn’t seem to know an overdose killed Jim. Today I have no doubt that it did—and that his life could have been saved.

After Jim's death people started dropping like flies, it seemed. Hearing someone you knew from the music scene dying from an overdose became commonplace. “Remember so-and-so, the drummer from so-and so?” “Yeah, why?” “He died of an overdose.”  “Far out.”

Only it wasn’t really so far out. It was just sad. I myself, along with my second husband, Three Dog Night singer Chuck Negron, had developed a hideous heroin habit, along with so many from our time. Friends died, we took it in stride: it was part of the price, part of the game.  

Who knew we would survive long enough to look back in sadness on the wasted lives and unsung songs, the unwritten poetry, and the unpainted art?

My own life was saved twice by Narcan (naloxone) administered by the private paramedic we kept on speed dial. My sister Connie OD’d in 1984; in 1985, I checked into rehab at Cedars, and never shot heroin again.

As time marched on, the day came when I saw my own son on life support, a victim of overdose—he lived thanks to medical intervention. But other rocker parents who did lose their children weren’t so lucky. We never thought this would happen. Oscar Scaggs, Jessica Rebennack, Andre Young Jr.—so many offspring of music legends lost. All lives that could have been saved, like mine, if overdose prevention and awareness was part of drug education in schools, rehabs and medical facilities.  

August 31st was International Overdose Awareness Day, a darn good idea. It’s a new time—a time when we are finally seeing that all life matters and that things change. Now that I am a cleverly preserved rock dowager, relying on my stories and memories for thrills, I’ve had to live with a painful awareness as a younger generation of rockers dies from overdose. Their numbers are legion, the sadness intolerable when I think of how they would have filled the world with their art for another 40 years like my living peers have. Long grey hair, our leather pants bursting a little bit at the bum, we are still full of stories and music and all the promise that rocked life in the 60s. I love the music coming from our new generations and want them to live.

On International Overdose Awareness Day, I took my hippie sensibilities out of moth balls and participated in a street protest in Hollywood to raise awareness about how overdose is preventable and a medical emergency should be treated with dignity and not fear of arrest. It was almost startling to walk out onto the newly sanitized "walk of fame.” All new and spiffy, it’s no longer the stomping grounds of long-haired freaks panhandling for dinner; now "actors" dressed up as Marilyn Monroe, Darth Vader and Charlie Chaplin walk the block. Looking down at the "stars" on the pavement, it was clear to me that overdose hits hard in the entertainment world. I placed a purple "prevent overdose" ribbon on quite a few.

I once lived around the corner back in my earliest Hollywood days, an easy hitchhike to my waitressing job on the Sunset Strip; my sister died in one of the decaying apartment buildings around the corner. Janis Joplin died around the corner as well, so it was the perfect spot for our "action." I hoped our speaker could be heard over the homeless guy with the bra on his head protesting support garments. 

I don't know how much we broke through to the large crowd of tourists that surrounded us, sizzling on the pavement like so many battered shrimp, but if one or two got the message, the scalding was worth it. At least half the protesters were my age, as well as a flock of what we'll call "reform" recovering folk—AA/NA's willing to have the "courage to change the things they can" outside the rooms.

Like a churchgoer, I am quiet and respectful in my own meetings so I can hear the message, but like many that believe in principles of compassion and fellowship in their respective "churches,” I have no problem taking it to the streets and being a missionary for policies that help, not harm. In this spirit, I salute the vibrant mix of grievers, addicts, activists, and just plain people who all showed up and were willing to fry on behalf of all who died and in support of all who can live with 911 good Samaritan legislation and Naloxone availability. 

If Jim Morrison were alive today, he would have surely have written about a poem about it. And maybe joined me, gray hair, bursting leathers pants and all.

Julia Negron is Los Angeles director of A New PATH (Parents for Addiction Treatment and Healing) and has organized a “Die-In” to raise Overdose prevention awareness (the group meets at 12:20 pm Wednesday at the Hollywood/Highland Metro station entrance). 

An Addiction Counselor’s War on Drugs

Some mental health professionals are realizing that profound changes have to occur health care before we can effectively deal with the mushrooming problem of drug addiction in America.  Barry Lessin is one therapist, stepping out on this issue.  He makes a point in his recent article that  America spends  fifty billion dollars per year to wage a war on drugs that has done nothing to slow the problem.  He goes on to say that failed policies focus primarily on the reduction of the supply of drugs by carrying out paramilitary operations in other countries as well as on drug users here in the United States, combined with amplified law enforcement approaches involving tens of millions arrested, and many millions incarcerated for nonviolent acts since the drug war began in the 70′s.   Barry Lessin brings up a few key points that legislators need to acknowledge if Americans want their tax dollars to count for something positive, that can deal with drug addiction and lessen demand without killing or ruining lives.  Please view his article by clicking on this link:   An Addiction Counselor’s War on Drugs | Barry Lessin.

Performance Art Meets Political Action! PATH Los Angeles "DIE IN"

Performance art meets political action as Parents for Addiction Treatment & Healing (PATH-LA) and their new campaign, Moms United to End the War on Drugs, along with the support of Drug Policy Alliance and other local advocacy groups, held a ‘Die-in’ in front of Grauman’s Chinese Theater to celebrate life and bring awareness to the lives lost by accidental drug overdose.

By Sam Sabzehar

Parents for Addiction Treatment & Healing, Moms United to End the War on Drugs, and The Drug Policy Alliance helped coordinate the "Die-In." (Photo credit: MedicalMarijuana411.com)

To commemorate and celebrate the lives of loved ones lost to accidental drug overdose around the world, a day of solidarity started by Salvation Army Australia, local actions and vigils took place around the world on August 31.

With roughly forty participants, mostly those affected by an overdose of a loved one, the group ‘Died’ on the Hollywood Walk of Stars in between Michael Jackson and The Doors, and drew a large crowd, especially while reading the names of the fallen.

Hollywood has had their fair share of accidental drug overdose and to commemorate International Overdose Awareness Day, the advocacy groups had coordinated the event online using Facebook and Twitter, asking participants to wear a picture of someone this world has lost due to accidental drug overdose.

Moms United is a campaign of the group A New PATH, which began in San Diego by Gretchen Burns Bergman. Julia Negron leads the L.A. chapter and along with Drug Police Alliance, were there in support of A New PATH”s campaign: Moms United to End the Drug War.

 

 

 

 

PD Editorial: Curbing the high cost of three strikes

Published: Monday, July 11, 2011 at 3:00 a.m.

Last Modified: Friday, July 8, 2011 at 1:13 p.m.

About one in every four California inmates is serving a sentence under the nation's most stringent repeat-offender law.

California is the only state that metes out life sentences for writing a bad check, trying to pry open the door of a church food pantry, stealing a jack from a tow truck and other nonviolent offenses that might not otherwise result in any jail time. In some three-strikes cases, inmates committed all their offenses on a single day. While these tend to be more serious crimes, that hardly fits the career-criminal profile offered as justification for the law.

It's little wonder that California is under a federal court order, affirmed by a decidedly conservative U.S. Supreme Court, to release thousands of inmates to relieve crowding in state prisons.

The first step will be moving some offenders to county jails. That will happen this fall. Another step should be revising three strikes to ensure that life sentences are meted out only for serious and violent felonies.

Lawyers at Stanford University's Three Strikes Project are drafting such an initiative, with an eye on the 2012 ballot.

And they may have allies from the California Correctional Peace Officers Association, the politically powerful prison guards union that fought past efforts to better target the three strikes law, including a ballot initiative in 2004. “We'd be open to reasonable modifications,” Jevaughn Baker, a union spokesman, told the San Jose Mercury News. “We have to have an efficient system.”

Under three strikes, the penalty doubles for a second conviction for an offense designated as serious or violent, and a sentence of 25-years-to-life is imposed for any subsequent felony, no matter how minor. Almost 9,000 inmates are serving life sentences on three-strikes convictions, and 32,000 others are two-strikers.

In a state that spends $50,000 per inmate annually — up from $20,000 when three strikes was adopted — the cost of enhanced sentences is huge. In 2009, state auditors estimated that taxpayers would spend an extra $19.2 billion over the duration of incarceration for the three-strikes inmates then in custody.

The law's history is closely entwined with Sonoma County. Before the 1993 kidnapping and murder of Polly Klaas, a 12-year-old Petaluma girl, by a parolee with a lengthy criminal record, three strikes legislation was bogged down in Sacramento, and an initiative campaign wasn't making much progress either. Both passed with a boost from Marc Klaas, the slain girl's father, who later became an outspoken opponent of three strikes.

Another Sonoma County case resulted in a state Supreme Court decision in 1996 that gave trial judges discretion, previously enjoyed only by prosecutors, to disregard prior convictions and reduce sentences in the interests of justice.

The exponential costs of three strikes were one reason that it was going nowhere before the Polly Klaas case. As the costs have mounted, political leaders have ducked for cover, afraid of being labeled as soft on crime.

Now, after years of state budget deficits and facing court orders to address prison crowding, voters should pass a new initiative to restrict three strikes to career criminals and the most serious crimes.

All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be re-published without permission. Links are encouraged. http://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20110711/OPINION/110709546?p=all&tc=pgall

Join "Moms United" and Students For Sensible Drug Policy

On June 18th  "Moms United To End The War On Drugs" says NO MORE DRUG WAR

COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS JUNE 18TH EVENT IS FREE!

SAVE THE DATE! June17/18 are national days of action protesting the failed War on Drugs, which is really a war on people... 

SPEAKERS, MUSIC, ART, POETRY, FOOD, CANDLELIGHT VIGIL REMEMBERING THOSE IMPACTED BY THE WAR ON DRUGS and more... click banner for info

from A New PATH Los Angeles & "Moms United to End the War on Drugs"

"Community Solutions" to the failed WAR ON DRUGS!

- A community response to the 40-year War on Drugs and Mass Incarceration - Get educated, empowered and entertained!

Saturday, June 18 · 1:00pm -  midnight

Chuco's Justice Center

1137 East Redondo Boulevard

Inglewood, California

A New PATH /Los Angeles is co-sponsoring with SSDP an all day festival SATURDAY JUNE 18TH; collaborating with 27 other drug war activist and advocacy groups to present 2 panels of speakers, poetry readings, candlelight vigil – ending the evening with live music till midnight!

About A New PATH (Parents for Addiction... Healing and Treatment) -

A New PATH works to reduce the stigma associated with addictive illness through education and compassionate support, and to advocate for therapeutic rather than punitive drug policies. We are anon-profit advocacy organization of parents, concerned citizens, individuals in recovery, healthcare professionals and community leaders working together to educate the public, media and decision makers about the true nature of the disease of addiction, reduce the harms of current drug laws and expand access to treatment services.

We advocate ending discriminatory drug policies that serve as roadblocks to recovery. We are bringing focus to our country's failed drug policies and the havoc they have wreaked on our families in our current campaign "Moms United to End the War on Drugs." We are leading a growing national movement dedicated to stopping the violence, mass incarceration and overdose deaths that are the result of current punitive and discriminatory drug policies. We started our movement in 2000 with our executive director Gretchen Bergman chairing the groundbreaking "Treatment instead of Incarceration" Prop 36 campaign.

Please email me if you need more information,
Julia Negron
Regional Director
A New PATH - Los Angeles
anewpathla@gmail.com

Recovery Defined – A Unified Working Definition and Set of Principles

Friday, May 20th, 2011

In August 2010, leaders in the behavioral health field, including people in recovery from mental health and addiction problems and SAMHSA met to explore the development of a common, unified definition of recovery. Prior to this conversation it was very apparent as to the need of a common definition. In fact, SAMHSA had separate definitions for recovery from mental and substance use conditions. These different definitions, along with other government agency definitions, complicate the discussion as we work to expand health insurance coverage for treatment and recovery support services.

After many conversations and hard work with our partners in the field, a working unified definition and set of principles for recovery has been developed. The development of a standard, unified working definition of recovery will help assure access to recovery-oriented services for those who need it, as well as reimbursement to providers.

Additionally, SAMHSA recognizes the importance of measuring the outcomes and quality of behavioral health services. As a result, SAMHSA is working to develop a set of measures to help assess a person’s recovery with an emphasis on developing indicators that assess quality of life.
Below you will find the working definition recovery and guiding principles.

Working Definition of Recovery
Recovery is a process of change whereby individuals work to improve their own health and wellness and to live a meaningful life in a community of their choice while striving to achieve their full potential.

Principles of Recovery

• Person-driven;
• Occurs via many pathways;
• Is holistic;
• Is supported by peers;
• Is supported through relationships;
• Is culturally-based and influenced;
• Is supported by addressing trauma;
• Involves individual, family, and community strengths and responsibility;
• Is based on respect; and
• Emerges from hope.

Furthermore SAMHSA’s Recovery Support Initiative identifies four major domains that support recovery:

• Health: overcoming or managing one’s disease(s) as well as living in a physically and emotionally healthy way;
• Home: a stable and safe place to live that supports recovery;
• Purpose: meaningful daily activities, such as a job, school, volunteerism, family caretaking, or creative endeavors, and the independence, income and resources to participate in society; and
• Community: relationships and social networks that provide support, friendship, love, and hope.

There is no set time requirement for recovery as it is recognized that this is an individualized process whereby each person’s journey of recovery is unique and whereby each person in recovery chooses supports, ranging from clinical treatment to peer services that facilitate recovery.

SAMHSA expects additional comments from the field as this definition evolves, and we continue to work together to help assure recovery services are being provided, reimbursed and measured in a consistent way. Check out SAMHSA’s Recovery Support Initiative for more information on recovery.
http://blog.samhsa.gov/2011/05/20/recovery-defined-a-unified-working-definition-and-set-of-principles/#comments%20

JOIN A New PATH in San Diego June 17th to Rally against the failure of the War on Drugs!

Time for California to tackle prison overcrowding

      May 24, 2011        Editorial

With the U.S. Supreme Court upholding an order to reduce the state's inmate population, the Legislature should take a first step by creating a panel to revise sentencing guidelines.

 

Gov. Jerry Brown is a reluctant prison reformer; in his former job as attorney general, he fought hard to stave off a federal court order requiring the state to reduce its inmate population. But with Monday's ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court upholding that order, Brown can't put off the big decisions anymore — and neither can the Legislature, which has been ignoring the prison problem for decades.

Perhaps because he understood the weakness of his own case, Brown seems to have been prepared for Monday's ruling in Brown vs. Plata, in which a 5-4 Supreme Court majority agreed that California's prison conditions were so bad that they violated the U.S. Constitution's ban on cruel and unusual punishment. Earlier this year he released a proposal for transferring thousands of inmates from state prisons to county jails, and last month he signed a bill, AB 109, to accomplish that. But that may not suffice.

 

At last count there were 142,000 inmates in California prisons, which are so overcrowded that some prisoners must be housed collectively in gymnasiums or alone in phone-booth-sized cages. Under the order upheld by the Supreme Court, the state must reduce its inmate population to 137.5% of the system's capacity — meaning about 110,000 — within two years.

Brown's plan to shift nonviolent offenders to county facilities is a partial solution. But the state would have to pay counties to take its prisoners, so the plan requires the Legislature, and ultimately voters, to approve an extension of the 2009 temporary tax hikes to fund the transfers. Those taxes are a subject of fierce debate as lawmakers bicker over closing the state's yawning multibillion-dollar deficit. Moreover, as it stands now, Brown's plan would cut the state inmate population by about 30,000 within three years, one year later than the federal order requires.

In his dissent, Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. argued histrionically that California was being mandated to release "the equivalent of three Army divisions" of criminals onto its streets; similarly, Justice Antonin Scalia wrote that "terrible things are sure to happen as a consequence of this outrageous order." But the truth is that experts have been suggesting responsible ways to ease prison overcrowding for years. One way is to create an independent panel to revise the state's haphazard sentencing guidelines, which all too often result in excessive terms that worsen overcrowding. In other states, sentencing commissions have lengthened penalties for truly dangerous felons while finding alternative punishments for minor offenders.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger backed such a commission, but he couldn't get the Legislature to go along. Maybe the threat of wide-scale prisoner releases can finally scare our lawmakers straight.

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-ed-prisons-20110524,0,1623381.story

Supreme Court backs cuts in California prison population

Supreme Court backs cuts in California prison population | abc7news.com

abclocal.go.com 

WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court on Monday endorsed a court order requiring California to cut its prison population by thousands of inmates to improve health care for those who remain behind bars.

The court said in a 5-4 decision that the reduction is "required by the Constitution" to correct longstanding violations of inmates' rights.

Justice Anthony Kennedy, a California native, wrote the majority opinion, in which he included photos of severe overcrowding. The court's four Democratic appointees joined with Kennedy.

"The violations have persisted for years. They remain uncorrected," Kennedy said.

Justice Antonin Scalia said in dissent that the court order is "perhaps the most radical injunction issued by a court in our nation's history." Scalia, reading his dissent aloud Monday, said it would require the release of "the staggering number of 46,000 convicted felons." Justice Clarence Thomas joined Scalia's opinion, while Justice Samuel Alito wrote a separate dissent for himself and Chief Justice John Roberts.

The case revolves around inadequate mental and physical health care in a state prison system that in 2009 averaged nearly a death a week that might have been prevented or delayed with better medical care.

The state's 33 adult prisons hold more than 142,000 inmates in its 33 adult prisons. The facilities were designed to hold about 80,000.  But the state has protested a court order to cut the population cut to around 110,000 inmates within two years.

(Copyright ©2011 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)

A Mother Speaks Out

Stories From The Movement

On June 13, 1971, I became a mother when my first son was born. Five days later, President Nixon declared the "war on drugs." Little did I know then that this war would be waged against families like mine for the next four decades.

I reflect on the joys and the challenges of motherhood, and I feel compelled to speak out against this silent but deadly war that has stealthily eaten away at the fabric of our lives. It has caused countless casualties, wasted taxpayer money, promoted discrimination against people of color, and taken away basic human liberties.

Employing fear-based, nonscientific dogma, this misguided war has robbed children of their futures, while building a massive prison-industrial complex. Grieving and angry mothers, tormented by needless loss, are speaking out to stop the violence, mass incarceration and overdose deaths.

Throughout history, mothers have come forward for the sake of their children to promote therapeutic and life-affirming policies. In the early '70s, I belonged to an organization called "Another Mother for Peace." In the 1930s, a group of mothers were instrumental in ending alcohol prohibition in the U.S. because they wanted to end the gangland violence and loss of lives caused by organized crime, fueled by Prohibition.

Moms can again be effective in calling for widespread drug policy reform, in order to stop the devastating loss of lives and liberty.

When my son was born, I realized that my most important role had just begun, and all my other passions and interests paled by comparison. Both of my sons were much adored, and we tried to give them every opportunity to ensure fabulous and fulfilling futures.

Unfortunately, both had addictive illness, which would have caused enough heartbreak and struggle, without the blundering roadblocks to recovery created by a criminal justice approach to what was essentially a health care problem. Besides dealing with the pain of lives interrupted by a life-threatening disorder, parents whose children are lost in the maze of addiction must also suffer humiliation, anger and stigma.

My older son spent a decade of his young life cycling through the criminal justice system for nonviolent drug offenses and relapse. This was a tragic waste of human potential, a painful journey for the family, and a tremendous cost to the state. I have several friends who have lost children to overdose, which could have been prevented if their children’s friends hadn’t been afraid of being arrested if they called the authorities.

With a Mama-bear mentality, I seek to alter what we know must be changed. I believe that we mothers are the silent majority. Far too many of us have experienced the devastation, but have been too stigmatized to speak out. To continue to pursue a war that has utterly failed and created so much damage is unconscionable. Mothers must speak out with courage and determination to promote policies of harm reduction and restoration for the sake of our children and the future of the next generation.

Gretchen Burns Bergman is the Co-Founder & Executive Director of A New PATH (Parents for Addiction Treatment & Healing). The Moms United to End the War on Drugs campaign is a project of A New PATH.